Comparing state-of-the-art regression methods for long term travel time prediction

dc.contributor.author João Mendes Moreira en
dc.contributor.author Jorge Freire de Sousa en
dc.contributor.author Alípio Jorge en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-16T14:10:51Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-16T14:10:51Z
dc.date.issued 2012 en
dc.description.abstract Long-term travel time prediction (TTP) can be an important planning tool for both freight transport and public transport companies. In both cases it is expected that the use of long-term TTP can improve the quality of the planned services by reducing the error between the actual and the planned travel times. However, for reasons that we try to stretch out along this paper, long-term TTP is almost not mentioned in the scientific literature. In this paper we discuss the relevance of this study and compare three non-parametric state-of-the-art regression methods: Projection Pursuit Regression (PPR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forests (RF). For each one of these methods we study the best combination of input parameters. We also study the impact of different methods for the pre-processing tasks (feature selection, example selection and domain values definition) in the accuracy of those algorithms. We use bus travel time's data from a bus dispatch system. From an off-the-shelf p en
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.inesctec.pt/handle/123456789/2828
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/IDA-2012-0532 en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation 5450 en
dc.relation 4981 en
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en
dc.title Comparing state-of-the-art regression methods for long term travel time prediction en
dc.type article en
dc.type Publication en
Files