Map-Matching Algorithms for Robot Self-Localization: A Comparison Between Perfect Match, Iterative Closest Point and Normal Distributions Transform

dc.contributor.author Héber Miguel Sobreira en
dc.contributor.author António Paulo Moreira en
dc.contributor.author Paulo José Costa en
dc.contributor.author Farias,PCMA en
dc.contributor.author José Lima en
dc.contributor.author Luís Freitas Rocha en
dc.contributor.author Sousa,I en
dc.contributor.author Carlos Miguel Costa en
dc.contributor.other 6164 en
dc.contributor.other 5153 en
dc.contributor.other 5156 en
dc.contributor.other 5157 en
dc.contributor.other 5364 en
dc.contributor.other 5424 en
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-14T14:08:10Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-14T14:08:10Z
dc.date.issued 2019 en
dc.description.abstract The self-localization of mobile robots in the environment is one of the most fundamental problems in the robotics navigation field. It is a complex and challenging problem due to the high requirements of autonomous mobile vehicles, particularly with regard to the algorithms accuracy, robustness and computational efficiency. In this paper, we present a comparison of three of the most used map-matching algorithms applied in localization based on natural landmarks: our implementation of the Perfect Match (PM) and the Point Cloud Library (PCL) implementation of the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) and the Normal Distribution Transform (NDT). For the purpose of this comparison we have considered a set of representative metrics, such as pose estimation accuracy, computational efficiency, convergence speed, maximum admissible initialization error and robustness to the presence of outliers in the robots sensors data. The test results were retrieved using our ROS natural landmark public dataset, containing several tests with simulated and real sensor data. The performance and robustness of the Perfect Match is highlighted throughout this article and is of paramount importance for real-time embedded systems with limited computing power that require accurate pose estimation and fast reaction times for high speed navigation. Moreover, we added to PCL a new algorithm for performing correspondence estimation using lookup tables that was inspired by the PM approach to solve this problem. This new method for computing the closest map point to a given sensor reading proved to be 40 to 60 times faster than the existing k-d tree approach in PCL and allowed the Iterative Closest Point algorithm to perform point cloud registration 5 to 9 times faster. © 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature en
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.inesctec.pt/handle/123456789/10830
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0765-5 en
dc.language eng en
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en
dc.title Map-Matching Algorithms for Robot Self-Localization: A Comparison Between Perfect Match, Iterative Closest Point and Normal Distributions Transform en
dc.type article en
dc.type Publication en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
P-00N-H8M.pdf
Size:
1.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: